A National Patient Identifier Would Be Totally Awesome!

Fun Fact:  Did you know that congress actually has a gag order preventing Health and Human Services(HHS) from even discussing the idea of a national health identifier?  Well fear no more... word on the street is that this might finally change.

America's multi-payer system is already complex enough. We also have to contend with a lack of a national health identifier?  Certainly national health identifiers have issues, but it is still a monumental step in the right direction.  While a national patient identifier will not fully solve the patient linking and matching problem, it will go quite a long way in improving the status quo.  I've spent way too much time thinking about how such an identifier should be constructed and issued.  Here are some main points:

  • It should be numeric so it is easy to enter via a number pad/telephone.
  • It should, in-part, be defined by the end user.  For example the first 10 digits could be someone's phone number
  • It should contain a check digit similar to credit card numbers and national provider identifiers (NPIs)
To this end, here is a short proposal on such an identifier.  While I think it should be recognized by the federal government, perhaps we should find a way to have it issued in a decentralized way.  Below is a link to a technical proposal entitled Universal Health Identifier (UHI):

https://github.com/TransparentHealth/uhi

Comments

  1. EmmaFebruary 10, 2020 at 3:15 AM

    I think this is an informative post and it is very useful and knowledgeable. therefore, I would like to thank you for the efforts you have made in writing this article. Patient care home service in Dhaka and Oxygen Cylinder home service in dhakaand Oxygen Cylinder sell and rentand Nursing Home Services

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Conveying Identity and Authenticator Assurance Levels in OpenID Connect and Beyond in Healthcare

Conveying Identity and Authenticator Assurance Levels in OpenID Connect and Beyond in Healthcare 1. Standards and the Proposed Rule NIST's Special Publication 800-63-3 Digital Identity Guidelines outlines 3 identity assurance levels, "1", "2", and "3" to codify how well a person is or isn't, with 1 being a low confidence a person is who they say they are.  Similarly, Authentication Assurance Levels (AALs) of "1", "2", and 3" are also defined in NIST guidelines.  IAL details the  "login" or Authentication event.

In ONC's proposed rule, "21st Century Cures Act: Interoperability, Information Blocking, and the ONC Health IT Certification Program", OpenID Connect is proposed in the following passage:   To enable and support persistent user authentication and app authorization processes, we propose to adopt a standards and additional implementation specification for the FHIR standard. First, we propose…
Read more

A Punchlist for Consumer Directed Exchange Success

Health data fluidity in the United States still has a way to go to get to an ideal state. Federal efforts, such as Meaningful Use, have improved the situation somewhat, but people still struggle to access their own health information. An effort to empower patients by giving them the power to move data around on their own is gaining momentum and attention. Although it can go by many names, its often referred to as "Consumer Directed Exchange".
To clear up some ambiguity, "Directed Exchange" in US health care most often refers to theDirect Project.Direct is an encrypted email-based point-to-point exchange mechanism thatis requiredto meet Meaningful Use criteria. Direct is often used for provider-to-provider and system-to-system communication. Direct has seen little adoption by consumers (i.e. patients). 
 The term "Consumer Directed Exchange",on the other hand, is a technology agnostic term that can refer to many things.Consumer Directed Exchange can include …
Read more